Thursday 18 October 2007

Getting away with murder

By TARIQ ALI


Before the war they said Iraq had 'weapons of mass destruction' that threatened the West. Those of us who opposed the war said this was a lie. George Bush, Tony Blair and John Howard thought that if they magnified the untruth people would believe it. They didn't. Now it's official. No WMD existed in Iraq.


Then we were told the people of Iraq would welcome the 'liberation'. Some of us warned there would be a resistance and were accused of living in the past. The resistance emerged and exposed the weaknesses of the occupation.US military leaders then said that the resistance was simply 'remnants of the old regime' and was being led by Saddam Hussein and once he was apprehended the problems would be manageable. We said that after the capture of Saddam, the resistance would grow even more. It is now obvious to all but the blind that with the partial exception of the Kurdish tribal leaders, the bulk of Iraq wants the West out of their country. The uprisings in southern Iraq last April showed how tenuous the grip of the occupation had become.
Will the citizens of the warmonger states now follow the Spanish example and punish their leaders, or are memories so short these days that lies are either considered insignificant or forgotten? An alert, intelligent and vigilant citizenry needs to make sure its leaders do not get away with murder.


The United States has already lost the war of images. Saddam's statue being torn down by US military equipment and a handful of mercenaries in a city of several million people did not exactly recall the Berlin Wall. It is the photographs of torture (now referred to casually in sections of the Western media as 'abuse') that have become the symbol of the war and the colonial occupation.An alert, intelligent and vigilant citizenry needs to make sure its leaders do not get away with murder.


Any people that has suffered colonial rule knows that torture has been part and parcel of imperial policy. When the news surfaced, Gerry Adams, the Sinn Fein leader, described in a newspaper article how he had been stripped and humiliated by the British. Numerous Palestinians described what was still going on in the Israeli gulags. It was the citizens of the West who were surprised. They had forgotten what their leaders had done for most of the 20th century.


The 'transfer of sovereignty' to Iraqis is, of course, another whopper. The irony in this case is that, as all Iraqis remember, this is a farcical repeat of what the British did after World War I when they received a League of Nations mandate to run Iraq. When the lease expired they kept their military bases and dominated Iraqi politics. The British embassy in Baghdad made the key decisions.


After June 30 it will be the US embassy that will play this role and John Negroponte, a tried and tested colonial official, who watched benignly as the death squads created mayhem in Central America, will be the de facto ruler of Iraq. The former CIA agent, Ayad Allawi, who worked as a low-leval police spy for the Saddam regime and was responsible for handing over the names of numerous dissidents, will be the new 'Prime Minister'. How can even the most naive camp-follower of the American empire regard this operation as a transfer of sovereignty?
Allawi has declared that what is needed is a tough policy to restore order. And tame commentators are already beginning to parrot that Arabs prefer strongmen to democracy. If Allawi fails, as he will, then like the fallen fraudster Ahmed Chalabi, he, too, will be removed. Both men are time-servers who, at a single nod from the conqueror, will sink into primitive obscurity.


The wealth and military strength of the US may enable it to buy the services and support of poorer and weaker states, but that will not stop the resistance in Iraq.It was the Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most senior Shiite cleric in Iraq, who first raised the demand for an elected constituent assembly to determine the future constitution in the country. His supporters argued it was no big problem to prepare an electoral register since the citizens were already registered for receiving food subsidies from the old regime. But this demand was rejected. It was too early for democracy. The people were traumatised, etc.


US ideologues such as Samuel Huntington now speak of the 'democratic paradox'. The paradox is the fact that people might elect governments unfriendly to the US.And few doubt that the two key demands of any genuinely elected government in Iraq would be (a) the withdrawal of all foreign troops and (b) Iraqi control of Iraqi oil. It is this that unites a large bulk of the country, and I am convinced that the Kurdish leaders at present engaged in dangerous manoeuvres with Israel will be isolated in their own territory if they carry on in this fashion.


Nothing will change in Iraq after June 30. It is a make-believe world where things are made to mean what the occupiers want them to mean and not what they really are. It is the Iraqi resistance that will determine the future of the country. It is their actions targeting both foreign soldiers and corporate mercenaries that has made the occupation untenable. It is their presence that has prevented Iraq from being relegated to the inside pages of the print media and forgotten by TV. It is the courage of the poor of Baghdad, Basra and Fallujah that has exposed the political leaders of the West who supported this enterprise.


The only response the US has got left is to increase the repression, but whether Negroponte will go in for the big kill before the US presidential election remains to be seen.


It might be a risky enterprise.

Tuesday 16 October 2007

Islam in 4 minutes

Islam is a way of life that fulfils mankind’s most essential needs so that they may reside with God’s creation in this universe in a state of peace and security. Such is the fruit of true submission to the Creator of this universe – Allah – the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds.

This way of life shows us how to realise these essential needs that Allah, the Creator and Lord of the universe has intended for mankind to follow across the twin spectrums of time and space. It is to this end that Allah sent all of His Messengers, from the first, Adam (May peace be upon him), including Moses and Jesus, the son of Mary until the last Messenger, Muhammed, May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon them all.

Yet divine wisdom decreed the presence of a struggle between truth and falsehood; good and evil. This has led to the distancing of many people, since the middle Ages until this day, from this belief system and its aims and objectives. This has resulted in chaos and confusion, until Allah sent His Prophet Muhammed to guide people to the truth and repel evil, prior to Allah beginning the resurrection and the ending of life upon earth. The message of Prophet Muhammed was a continuation of original divine messages. At the same time it abrogated them as they had all been subject to distortion and did not remain the messages that Allah, the Mighty and Exalted, revealed.

It is not possible for one who desires to worship his Creator to follow these messages while they are in this distorted format and at the same time leave the message which will lead him to the realisation of the essential needs of man without distortion – such is the message of Islam which was bought by Muhammed, Peace Be Upon Him.

Pure submission to the Sustainer and cherisher of mankind may only come about through the embracing of the religion of Islam, that is by man testifying that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammed is His servant and Messenger. This means that Allah, alone is the one deserving of worship, He is the only being endowed with wholly divine qualities, other divinities fall short of this description and do not deserve recognition as God. This brings one to the second half of this testification that Muhammed, the Arabian Prophet, who was a human being, servant of God and the last of the Prophets and Messengers. It is obligatory for all of mankind to adhere to His divinely inspired way of life – Shariah



Man’s Essential Needs
The first of these essential needs is Faith;
this is what man believes regarding himself, his creator, the universe and the purpose of life. The answers to these key questions which all of mankind must address are answered through religion. If one’s religion is sound the answers would likewise be sound, this would be indicated through tranquillity and peace that settles in the soul. This is an aim common to all human souls. Therefore the faith of Islam is invaluable, the life of individuals and societies are based upon it. It deserves our utmost respect and attention. It is the most important essential need.

In order to preserve faith, the Creator, being fully cognizant with what is appropriate for His creation, ordained fundamental practises without which true surrender to Allah is not realised. He named these as pillars of Islam. It is not feasible that man could be a worshiper of his creator, realising the purpose of his life, without upholding these practises.

The second of these, after ones testifying that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammed is His Messenger, is ones establishing five prayers throughout the day and night. These prayers, being a tradition practised by the Prophets and believers, have specified times and characteristics.

Thirdly, that a wealthy person gives a portion of their wealth to the needy from amongst the poor and destitute and others, such is called Zakat. This is in fact the first economic dynamic for building a community; rather it is the first societal dynamic as it creates ties between disparate members of the society. It removes the envy, which may be harboured by the poor man for the rich as it may be seen he gives from his wealth enough to sustain his basic needs of life. The spectre of poverty is removed from people and the wealthy are purified from their greed. It places a limit on one’s love of wealth.

The Fourth of these pillars is SAUM (fasting). One abstains from food, drink and sexual intercourse from sunrise until sunset during the lunar month known as Ramadan; by means of it one draws near to one’s Lord and endeavours to live a month of complete spirituality where one reduces human worldly desires so that ones spiritual vigour may flourish. There is an increase in the brotherly bond with those who do not find their daily food and drink and an increase in gratitude and indebtedness to ones Creator. So one becomes keener to eradicate the want and need of those who feel the pain and anguish of hunger. One thus draws closer to his or her Lord, increases in love for Him and distances oneself from that which he dislikes. It is in this manner that one implements the Islamic way of life (Shariah) on earth, with its emphasis on justice, security, peace and equanimity.

The last of these pillars is Hajj (pilgrimage). One in a position to carry out the pilgrimage travels to the noble sanctuary of Mecca, during the Hajj period, and endeavours to carry out the spiritually significant ceremonies, which trace back to the patriarch and father of the prophets, Abraham, peace be upon him.

Thus there occurs a gathering on a truly monumental level, as millions come together from all over the world. Man feels that he has brothers all over the earth. Their differences are removed as they change their regular clothes for the modest and similar dress of Ihram (as characterized by two white sheets worn by men as wraps).

Through the fulfilment of these pillars in an excellent manner, they come together to form the fulfilment of a single aim – the realisation of the purpose of mans life – implementing the Shariah of Allah on this earth, thus the whole of the creation can live as their Creator wants.

Those who commit to the above deserve to be among the successful after their death, since Allah, the Almighty, has promised them an immense reward: eternal life in Gardens of pleasure where they shall receive that which their hearts desire, and they will have no wish to go out of it. Thus man would live in that state for eternity, neither would he be subject to toil nor sickness, or sadness. He would be surrounded by joy upon joy.

In contrast, those who rebelled against the Shariah of Allah and devoted themselves to other than Allah, basing his way of life upon legislation that Allah did not authorise. Such would deserve a burning fire after their death and an unbearable punishment. This is because his actions bring chaos and calamities upon the creation. Indeed life becomes chaotic when other than Allah’s Shariah is implemented. It is thus obligatory upon us to prevent men from such corruption. Thus we must make every effort against the wrongdoers until only the Shariah of Allah is established with concurrent peace and security. Thus the forces of evil and the devil, who desire mankind to be bound to a life of misery and constraint in this world and the next, are overcome.

The second of the essential needs is Protection of Life.
According to Islam, in principle mans blood is inviolable; it is through the implementation of Islam that lives are secured and none may disregard the rights of others. Islam prohibits killing and all means that lead to it. It placed tough punishments for those who disrespect the human race, some of which extends to taking the life of the perpetrator.

The THIRD of the essential needs is the Protection of intellect.
The Creator has made the intellect the most significant human attribute. Allah has encouraged us to use our faculty of reason in all matters that benefit mankind. Indeed, it is through the intellect that Allah has distinguished man from others of the creation; with the reduction of this faculty his pre-eminence is reduced to the extent that man can be reduced to the level of cattle or even below that. Thus a chaotic vacuum takes hold and man’s life loses its balance. The means to the human existence that Allah, the Creator, requires of us are destroyed. In order to protect the intellect Allah has prohibited – not only in Islam, but in all divinely based religions – anything that destroys or reduces the faculty of reason or otherwise interferes with it. To this end alcohol and intoxicating drugs are prohibited.

The FOURTH matter is the PROTECTION OF DIGNITY.
Islam protects the dignity of man. Man’s reputation is a priceless commodity. Assaults upon the dignity of a person lead only to a cycle of abuse and distorting others character. Fragmented and insincere relations thus stain the fabric of civilization. To this end Islam has prohibited insulting, swearing, the use of foul language and despising others. On the contrary Islam has ordained the highest morals and legislated against some of the aforementioned transgressions.

The FINAL essential need is the protection of wealth.
The need and desire to own capital is one of mans greatest distinguishing traits. The Shareah of Islam, as revealed by the Lord of Mankind and all creation, is in accordance with human nature and confirmed this right. The Socialist system is contrary to this. Rather, Islam regulated and refined this matter - contrary to the Capitalist system. Mans sole concern in this life should not be merely satiating his material or bodily desires. To this end Islam has prohibited theft and instituted a severe exemplary punishment for those who criminally take the wealth of others. Usury (interest) is also prohibited in Islam as it based upon the exploitation of the needy. Thus the rich increase their wealth ands the poor fall deeper into poverty. Likewise Islam has prohibited all forms of deception and trading in prohibited items. Zakat has been instituted so that a portion of the wealth of the nation may be unconditionally shared by all members of the society. Charity in general and extending material and moral benefit has been greatly encouraged.

This is the way of life known as Islam. Mankind’s life will never be sound without it. Therefore it is imperative that the whole of mankind follow it order to succeed with the reward of Paradise and be saved from the punishment of the Fire of Hell.

After this, would a person with reason and after some thought; one seeking happiness, peace and tranquillity for themselves and their society, reject the call of Islam for themselves and their society. This is a call to people of reason.

From Haytham Al-Hadad

Monday 18 June 2007

Request to Sir Richard Branson - October 2005

Dear Sir Richard,

I am sure you have been inundated with requests for funds, following the recent devastating earthquake which hit South Asia. While I am not asking for any money, I would be grateful for a few moments of your valuable time to consider a fundraising proposal which could benefit enormously from your support and participation. You are widely recognised as an earnest philanthropist and it is with this in mind that I am approaching you, with every hope in my heart that you will hear this plea, on behalf of those affected, with your usual compassion and sympathy.

As you will be aware, the affected areas are in desperate need not only of hospitals, schools, orphanages, and housing but also of the most basic infrastructure which has been almost entirely destroyed. India, Afghanistan and Pakistan are mourning the deaths of thousands of children, many of whom died while at school. Kashmir is reported to resemble a graveyard where people have been either digging to recover bodies or digging to bury them. It is the biggest natural disaster to hit the area. The approach of an unforgiving winter makes immediate action imperative if our world is to prevent an even worse toll of insufferable misery and death.

I am a British Muslim living in Brighton and, since the earthquake, I have been working as a member of the Brighton & Hove Muslim Forum with the local community to raise money and resources to send to the region. Recently, in conjunction with BBC Southern Counties Radio, we launched a one-day radio appeal which received over 3000 blankets and approximately 50 large heavy duty domestic tents. During the day we managed to speak with Imran Khan and Yvonne Ridley, both of whom were reporting live from Pakistan. Our appeal was supported by leaders of many different faiths, which was particularly helpful. Although it was only a one day appeal, the response was overwhelming and very encouraging-an indication of the true generosity of the British public.

We know that much more can be done but we lack the ability, experience and resources to do so. Given the huge success of television fundraising programmes, for example Comic Relief and Children in Need, we believe that a major contribution to the much needed rescue and relief work could be achieved if something similar was co-ordinated in response to this disaster. We already have a blue-print from past events and today, given your involvement, a number of celebrities here in Britain and perhaps outside (such as our cricket team in Pakistan, David Beckham in Spain and many others) may be persuaded to assist in an appeal. You may also wish to ask other prominent religious leaders such as Sir Jonathan Sacks or Dr Rowan Williams, as well as Hindu and Muslim leaders, to say a few words.

Throughout the period of the appeal regular reports from the region would keep the
public aware of the desperate needs of the disaster victims, as well as the actual and potential benefits from the contributions being, and already, received. Some celebrities may offer to do small shows or sketches in between. Regular checks can be made at various areas in the country to see how the total is shaping up. Individual and team-collection stories can be aired live. I am sure that, with a little brainstorming, a host of excellent ideas may be produces to make the program productive yet entertaining.

Your own and your companies’ involvement would be invaluable in persuading the BBC or ITV to set up a telethon to raise funds. With the onset of Christmas, this is an ideal time for a predominately Christian country like ours to lead the international community in recognizing the enormity of the task facing this disaster-stricken region and to show our generosity towards those less fortunate than ourselves. This would be a remarkable gesture from a Christian country to a Muslim country, demonstrating that even with the intensity of the current political climate, peoples of different faiths can and do help each other.

We are not looking for any recognition for our organisation; we just wish to make a difference. I have no doubt that, if you agree, you would have the lasting gratitude of a whole nation and the complete support of our own public.

Kindest regards


PS: I have been encouraged to write this letter by your generous response to an appeal made by my aunt, Moira, for a donation for a charity auction following a treasure hunt in France in 1999 and again in 2001. Ever since then, my aunt has spoken repeatedly of your benevolence with enormous respect and, if you’ll forgive me, great affection. She has asked to be remembered to you.

Sunday 17 June 2007

Professor Alasdair Smith, Vice Chancellor, University of Sussex.

Dear Professor Smith


It was an honour to be present at the 45th Annual Meeting of University Court.

I am proud to be associated with the Universities achievements and successes and I offer you our full support for the future.
However I would also like to take this opportunity to request that as part of the current developments that are taking place at our University, it would be very encouraging if the university confirms its commitment to the greatly needed refurbishment of the university mosque, which is in great demand and in regular daily use by our Muslim students.
Our University has a world wide reputation and the Sussex campus mosque often welcomes senior scholars from the Muslim world, not to mention a number of dignitaries from within our shores, such is its reputation. Our University continues to attract Muslim students from all over the world, many of whom I meet regularly and it is very much their wish that a commitment be made to improve the current mosque by meeting their modest religious requirements.
You may be aware that in a recent poll of Muslims, over 85% said their religion was vital, so you can understand the importance of this matter.


This will be a good opportunity for our University to reaffirm its commitment to its current and prospective Muslim students that it is more than willing to continue to meet the needs of those who study here and use the mosque facilities daily.
The last five presidents of the Islamic society of our University, going back to Kadeer Arif and later Daoud Clarke had regular meetings with the Director of Estates David Kirkwood to request the much needed improvements. Feasibility studies were offered and carried out by the university, but sadly, have not led to fruition.
In contrast, Brighton University seems far more progressive in this manner and it has committed funds to refurbish the prayer area and the washing facilities, but has also continually listened and worked towards accommodating various other important requirements and needs of its students.


The previous presidents and the current president, Kashif Jarral do acknowledge the help and essential maintenance carried out by the university, including the fixing of lights, electric sockets and recently the washing of the carpet. However, certain areas of the prayer room do require regular maintenance. The main examples of these include:


1. The carpet – this was washed recently by the university, but still appears old, dirty and gives a stale odour despite regular cleaning by the students. This is an integral part of a Muslim prayer room, as worshippers stand and prostrate on it five or more times a day. It is becoming evident that a new carpet is the only answer to solve this problem.

2. The washroom – again this is an essential part of the prayer room as worshiper perform the obligatory washing of the hands, arms, face and the feet daily before prayer. The taps have been fixed on countless occasions, but end up leaking or losing their function, resulting in another call out to the University for Maintenance. Another problem is that there is no hot water available; the taps give out very cold water, which is extremely uncomfortable to wash one’s hands, arms, face and the feet, especially during the winter months. Again it appears that it would be more efficient to replace the essential parts of the wash room – sinks and taps so that they always work, with both hot and cold water.

3. Heating – this issue has risen on a number of separate occasions with previous Islamic society committees working hard for the installation of a new heating system. Currently there are electric radiators in the building, which are very inefficient in keeping the entire building warm; it must also incur a large cost on the university’s electricity usage no doubt. An integrated heating system is the only solution to keeping the building warm in energy effective and cost efficient manner.


In conclusion it must be noted that the much needed University Mosque refurbishment is far over due. Those who regularly visit our University Mosque and this includes many non Muslims from within our University have raised to me the same concerns. Senior members present at the 45th Annual Meeting of the University Court also approached me after this meeting to air their support. The poor state of the washing facilities, the heating/ventilation problems and the basic upkeep need to be dealt with urgently, I would request if this matter can be given some serious consideration by your senior management team and budget holders responsible for maintenance. The improvements you make will only enhance the name of our University. I leave this in your capable hands.


I look forward to you reply.


Kind regards

Friday 15 June 2007

Guantanamo Bay and Omar Deghayes, a letter to Mr Gordon Brown

Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP
Prime Minister in waiting

It might be fair to say that we, in Britain, have traditionally defended the weak and the destitute. We could claim to have contributed to the establishment of human rights systems to protect those who are oppressed, ill-treated, tortured and forgotten. In keeping with our responsibilities towards our fellow man, we have provided a save haven for many whose only crime has been to speak their truth and stand up for justice.

In 1986, the British government demonstrated this will to offer refuge to those in danger elsewhere, following the assassination of Libyan lawyer and a prominent trade unionist, Mr Deghayes in Libya. The family of Mr Deghayes, including his son Omar, was settled in the UK where they were granted political asylum. In 1987 Omar was given refugee status and his family became British citizens. Omar Deghayes grew up in Brighton and studied law in a British university. His ambition is to be a human rights lawyer.

After finishing his Law studies in 2001, Omar and his friends traveled to Malaysia, Pakistan and then on to Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, Omar was married and his wife later had a son, Suleiman, who is now five years old.

When hostilities broke in October 2001, Omar feared for his family's safety and moved them to Pakistan on his way back to Britain. However, in Pakistan, Omar and his family were arrested and handed over to the US authorities, reportedly for a bounty of US$5,000. Although his wife and son were released, he was taken to US-run prison at Bagram, a place which Omar likened to the Nazi prison camps he had seen in films. He was later transferred to Camp X Ray at Guantanamo Bay where he remains to this day. Omar is one of eight British men currently in Guantanamo. Even though expert evidence has exonerated him by stating that this is a genuine case of mistaken identity (Omar was not the man they were looking for by a startling turn of events, the original suspect has actually now passed away) he is still there. His wife is without her husband, his son without his father.

Omar's case has never been brought to trial and while imprisoned he has repeatedly suffered cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and sometimes torture. Currently and unfortunately we are one of four governments involved in his detention, and we need not be. His detention has resulted in him being denied justice for over five years.

On one occasion, Omar was repeatedly pepper-sprayed in the eyes and face, and a guard forced his finger into one of Omar’s eyes, leaving him blind in that eye. At other times, a jet of high pressure water was sprayed up his nose until he thought he would suffocate. Omar was kept in solitary confinement for over eight months and on the 9th and 11th of September 2004 he was interrogated by Libyan intelligence agents who threatened him with violence and death. In addition, British intelligence agents are reported to have interrogated Omar Deghayes up to seven times while in Bagram and Guantanamo.

Despite the fact that Omar has lived and grown up in the UK, and established many ties, it seems that our government is refusing to get involved or to help and has denied all responsibility for Omar Deghayes, claiming that, as a refugee, he is technically not a British citizen and, therefore, not within its jurisdiction. Our government, quite simply, wiped its hands of him.

When you were in Brighton recently, you kindly agreed to look into this matter.
I am writing to you now to ask that our government make representations on behalf of Omar Deghayes as a British resident with refugee status, and ensure that his family are kept fully informed of his legal status and welfare. We must stand up for justice and show the world that we do not ignore our responsibilities. I also ask for the allegations of torture and ill-treatment that Omar has suffered while in US custody to be raised with the US authorities. Our government must do all that is can to make sure that Omar Deghayes is not transferred to a country where he will face further torture and ill-treatment.

Our history shows that Britain has always supported the oppressed, and we must continue to do so. This is clearly the case with Omar. No one else can help but our own government. Furthermore, please seek assurance from the US authorities that Omar Deghayes is returned to the UK. The US should either release him or charge him with a recognizably criminal offence and give him a full and fair trial, ensuring that evidence gained through torture is not used against him. The US is potentially one of the most important countries in the fight for world peace. It is the one nation that has the economic and political power to put pressure on countries and regimes which are guilty of abuse. The US could make itself the most beloved nation worldwide if only it would step into this role and help safeguard the needy.

It was not long ago when we offered Omar and his family a lifeline from the difficulties they faced in Libya. Today, when he needs us more then ever, let us not turn our back on him.

We ask you as our Prime Minister in waiting to seek justice for him and have him removed from the sentence he is serving for a crime he did not commit.

Yours Sincerely,